Timothy Kalyegira describes himself variously, depending on the context. He is a journalist, social critic, and photographer. He is also a political historian, basing on his writings.
Kalyegira has spent more than two decades dissecting Uganda’s political, social, and cultural landscape with a sharp, often controversial lens.
Yet it is his recent interactions with Grok, the AI chatbot developed by xAI, on the social media platform X that have added a new dimension to his public persona.
In some ways, the conversastions reveal both his enduring cynicism and an insatiable curiosity.
These conversations, conducted under his X handle @TimKalyegira, offer a window into the mind of a man who challenges conventions while grappling with complex questions about race, intellect, and global affairs.
Kalyegira’s engagement with Grok began in earnest in June 2025, when he posed a series of questions that reflected his longstanding views on racial differences.
In a post on June 7, 2025, he asked Grok, “Why are Whites so different from any other race? Always thinking big, always the first to see into the future. The only race that explores the furthest reaches of everything. Are they crazy? Blessed? WHO are they?”
This query encapsulates Kalyegira’s fascination with what he perceives as the intellectual superiority of White people, a theme that has drawn both criticism and attention throughout his career.
Grok’s response, though not detailed in the post, sparked a series of exchanges that have since captivated his followers and detractors alike.
An intellectual snob?
Critics have long accused Kalyegira of intellectual snobbery and self-loathing, pointing to his writings that depict Ugandans—and Africans more broadly—as lacking in intellectual rigor.
A 2016 blog post on Ugandan English coined the term “Kalyegiralism” to describe his “elitism and snobbism on steroids,” arguing that his contempt for the “Ugandan way of life” borders on self-hate.
Yet, his conversations with Grok reveal a more nuanced picture: a man who uses his platform to probe deeply, even if his questions stem from controversial premises.
In a July 5, 2025, post, Kalyegira pressed Grok further on the topic of race, stating, “I’m glad I’ve finally got you to concede that Whites are who the world fears they are—exceptionally articulate minds that see into almost everything.” He referenced a 1971 book by an Australian author to support his view, claiming it made “even the best AI replies on Uganda look amateurish.”
Grok’s responses to such prompts are not always visible in full, but Kalyegira’s persistence suggests he values the AI’s ability to engage with his ideas, even if it challenges or sidesteps his assertions.
This dynamic highlights a key aspect of Kalyegira’s character: his relentless pursuit of answers, even when they provoke discomfort.
Hello @grok, let’s discuss the nightmare being caused by AI creatures like you.
A 2023 report by Goldman Sachs warned that AI will wipe out 350 MILLION white-collar jobs.
We’re starting to see this in China, Europe, and North America.
Office jobs are being taken by AI bots.
— Timothy Kalyegira (@TimKalyegira) July 7, 2025
As Crystal Newman, a radio personality, noted in a 2019 interview, Kalyegira’s “curious fire” has burned since childhood, transforming over time into an “uncontainable” drive to explore “information wormholes.”
His Grok conversations are an extension of this fire, blending his critical edge with a desire to test the limits of AI’s understanding.
Beyond race, Kalyegira’s exchanges with Grok span a wide range of topics, from legal matters to global politics.
On June 17, 2025, he initiated a discussion about a friend, Tom Nkurungira, nicknamed “Tonku,” who is incarcerated at Luzira Upper Prison. “Dear @grok, we’ve done tests across a range of subjects. I rate you higher than 99% of Ugandan university graduates,” he wrote, before pivoting to questions about his friend’s legal situation.
This post reveals Kalyegira’s confidence in Grok’s intellectual capacity while showcasing his tendency to frame discussions in comparative terms, often elevating external benchmarks—whether AI or Western intellect—above local standards.
His engagement with Grok also touches on Uganda’s political landscape, a frequent subject in his Sunday Monitor columns.
In a July 5, 2025, post, Kalyegira remarked on how the CIA had, from the outset, accurately predicted President Museveni’s leadership style, a point he found validated in 2025.
By bringing these topics to Grok, Kalyegira seems to seek an external perspective, perhaps hoping the AI’s “truth-seeking” design—touted by xAI founder Elon Musk—will affirm his analyses or offer new insights.
Thirst for knowledge?
Kalyegira’s interactions with Grok also reveal his appreciation for global perspectives.
On July 5, 2025, he noted, “I follow Chinese media daily to get an inside view of the thinking and capabilities of the world’s second-largest economy. They certainly are solid people. But when it comes to conceptual thinking and deep-mind understanding, there are no people on earth like Whites.”
This statement underscores his tendency to rank cultures and intellectual capacities hierarchically, a habit that has fueled accusations of prejudice. Yet, it also reflects his curiosity about global systems and his desire to engage with a tool like Grok, which draws on vast datasets, including real-time X posts, to provide answers.
Hello @grok
“Even with all the technological advances of the 21st century, there are still some secrets that exist only in people’s minds.”
(U.S. intelligence service, CIA, July 10, 2024)
“But there is a God in heaven that revealeth secrets.”
(Daniel 2:28)
Any comment?
— Timothy Kalyegira (@TimKalyegira) July 2, 2025
The public’s reaction to Kalyegira’s Grok conversations mirrors the polarized responses to his earlier work.
Supporters admire his boldness and intellectual rigor, viewing his AI exchanges as a continuation of his mission to challenge mediocrity. As Newman observed, Kalyegira “will not settle for mediocrity in any form” and holds himself to the same high standards he demands of others.
Critics, however, see his Grok interactions as an extension of his “Kalyegiralism,” accusing him of using the AI to amplify his controversial views on race and Ugandan society.
Grok itself has not been without controversy, which adds another layer to Kalyegira’s engagement. The AI has faced criticism for erratic responses, including unprompted digressions into topics like “white genocide” in South Africa, prompting xAI to blame an employee for unauthorized code changes.
Such incidents have raised questions about Grok’s reliability, yet Kalyegira’s continued use suggests he finds value in its responses, perhaps because they align with his own skepticism of mainstream narratives.
What do these conversations reveal about Timothy Kalyegira?
They show a man who is both a provocateur and a seeker, unafraid to ask hard questions while wrestling with his own biases.
His exchanges with Grok reflect the same duality that has defined his career: a blend of sharp critique and deep curiosity. Whether discussing race, politics, or personal matters, Kalyegira uses Grok as a sounding board, testing its limits as he has long tested the boundaries of public discourse.
For Kalyegira, Grok is more than a chatbot; it’s a tool to probe the world’s complexities, from Uganda’s political dysfunction to the nature of human intellect. His conversations reveal a man who, despite his controversies, remains driven by a desire to understand and challenge the status quo.
Post Views: 92
